SecurityVault
Request a demo
Coming soon

Move from security signals
to coordinated response.

Bring detection context, investigation and response workflows together. Help analysts understand affected assets, prioritise cases and coordinate actions with the teams that own them.

Discuss your requirements SecurityVault for SOC teams
A signal becomes an investigationincident
Security investigation
Incoming signal
Affected entities
Response context
Investigation context
01 / Scope signals

Agree which signals matter.

  • Signal source
  • Coverage scope

Discuss the sources and investigation context required for an evaluation.

Detect
Detection as code
Linted, tested, replayed.
Triage
Grouped, ranked alerts
Less noise, clearer priority.
Hunt
Hypothesis to incident
Queries, evidence, timeline.
Respond
Audited playbooks
Approval gates on impactful steps.
The category

What is threat detection and response?

Prevention reduces risk; detection and response handles what gets through. Events from identity providers, cloud control planes, workloads and applications arrive in many formats and must be normalised before a rule can read them. Rules then turn events into alerts, and alerts compete for an analyst's attention. Mature programmes treat rules as code, measure their accuracy, and close the loop with a postmortem.

Detection and response design

  1. Security signal

    Preserve the originating event and source.

  2. Investigation context

    Relate the signal to the affected environment.

  3. Response review

    Keep the action and its evidence together.

Designed workflow: confirm the supported response scope during evaluation.

The hard problems

Where does a SOC lose time, and how will SecurityVault help?

Fidelity

Rules that fire on the right things

Every rule will be mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, tested with cases and scored by replaying labelled history, with coverage gaps shown in the matrix.

Priority

The alert that matters first

Duplicate alerts will be grouped, and each one ranked on severity, asset criticality, technique, indicator matches and recurrence.

Context

What the asset is, and who owns it

Activity on a workload will show the image it runs and the open findings in that image, so an analyst will see the likely way in and the owning team.

The design

What will the workflow look like, from event to postmortem?

1 · Collect
Will normalise events from diverse sources into one schema and search them with a query language that supports filters, time ranges and aggregations.
2 · Detect
Will evaluate tested detection rules and raise alerts with asset criticality and exposure already attached, so activity on an internet-facing system that holds sensitive data rises to the top.
3 · Investigate
Will run hunts from hypothesis to evidence on an investigation graph that links users, addresses, hosts, services, alerts and findings, showing blast radius before containment decisions are made.
4 · Respond
Will promote a hunt to an incident and manage it through containment, eradication and recovery, with playbooks that branch on conditions, pause at manual approval gates and notify tools such as Jira, Slack and PagerDuty.
5 · Learn
Will close with an approved postmortem that records time to detect and time to respond. Its lessons will then be able to become policy in the fail-closed deployment gates you run today, so the same weakness is stopped before it ships again.
FAQ

Detection and response questions.

Will SecurityVault's detection and response replace my SIEM?
It is designed to work with the security operations you already run. SecurityVault already streams findings, audit events and security events to an existing SIEM (see integrations). Detection and response will add event normalisation and search inside SecurityVault, with every alert carrying what the platform knows about the code, artefact, cloud resource and identity involved.
What does detection as code mean here?
Detection rules will be linted for missing metadata, invalid MITRE ATT&CK references and unsafe regular expressions, tested with given-when-then cases, and replayed against labelled historical events to measure true positives, false positives and misses before they reach production.
Will playbooks act automatically?
Playbooks are designed to support conditions, branching and manual approval gates. Actions with real-world impact, such as changes to credentials, access or tickets, will require the right privilege, and every step will be recorded as an audit event.
Will an AI assistant make decisions on incidents?
No. The assistant is designed to answer common analyst questions from events, alerts and incidents using deterministic templates, with every answer audited. It will never write a finding's status or disposition.
When will detection and response be available?
Detection and response is in development. Review your detection sources and incident workflows with us to understand the planned response capabilities.

Available today: SIEM and ticketing integrations · vulnerability management · identity and entitlements. Related offerings: threat intelligence · breach and attack simulation. Built for SOC and incident response teams.

Discuss your requirements

Tell us how your SOC works today.

Review your alert sources, investigation handoffs and response requirements with our engineers.

Discuss your requirements View the platform